From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Getting full bug database dump? Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:00:26 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87iqb5o7ie.fsf@red-bean.com> <87k4vkltop.fsf@red-bean.com> <87wrzkogph.fsf@gmx.de> <87ska8k8jv.fsf@red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263492213 23719 80.91.229.12 (14 Jan 2010 18:03:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:03:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Albinus , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 14 19:03:25 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NVU2W-0001Nl-8I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:03:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55078 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVU2X-0000Eg-55 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:03:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVU05-0007ic-BQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:00:53 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVTzz-0007bN-Si for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:00:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59192 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVTzz-0007b5-Nk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:00:47 -0500 Original-Received: from tomts43.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.110]:54640 helo=tomts43-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVTzz-0007kb-3z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:00:47 -0500 Original-Received: from toip5.srvr.bell.ca ([209.226.175.88]) by tomts43-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20100114180030.VGPR1786.tomts43-srv.bellnexxia.net@toip5.srvr.bell.ca> for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:00:30 -0500 Original-Received: from bas1-montreal42-1178046351.dsl.bell.ca (HELO ceviche.home) ([70.55.143.143]) by toip5.srvr.bell.ca with ESMTP; 14 Jan 2010 13:01:04 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3833570035; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:00:27 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87ska8k8jv.fsf@red-bean.com> (Karl Fogel's message of "Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:31:00 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120018 Archived-At: >> The package is unfinished. I lost interested when I found out, that the >> SOAP interface of debbugs does not support sorting (which is >> inconvenient for a larger number of bugs returned). >> However, it might be worth to continue the work? > Hmm. I can see how it would be useful, but if it would still be > one-way, I'm not it would be worth it... If it integrated with > message-mode, to make it two-way, that would be something. Clearly, we'd want to make it bodirectional. Not just via message-mode, but also by extending the SOAP interface so we can send commands (the advantage being, as you pointed out, that we can get "immediate" confirmation that the command was accepted). Stefan