From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8179: 24.0.50; vc thinks that SVN takes care of all my files Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:04:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300216036 20539 80.91.229.12 (15 Mar 2011 19:07:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:07:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8179@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 15 20:07:12 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PzZaI-0007IT-Vc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:07:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57160 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PzZaI-0007Dy-Aq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:07:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47255 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PzZaA-0007C7-Im for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:07:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PzZa9-0003dk-DD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:07:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35771) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PzZa9-0003dg-Bl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:07:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PzZYE-0000cY-DI; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8179 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8179-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8179.13002158542326 (code B ref 8179); Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Mar 2011 19:04:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PzZXR-0000bT-DN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:04:13 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PzZXP-0000bH-AS for 8179@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:04:12 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAMNUf01FxIRf/2dsb2JhbACmCHiIQbl/hWIElVs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,189,1299474000"; d="scan'208";a="96650972" Original-Received: from 69-196-132-95.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.196.132.95]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 15 Mar 2011 15:04:05 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id CE40D660C9; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:04:04 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:34:59 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:05:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:45050 Archived-At: > If it's not possible, it should be moved to the end of the list. I think the better approach is to use a "breadth first search". Stefan