From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r106464: Fix asynchrounous GnuTLS socket handling on some versions of the GnuTLS library. Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:50:35 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1321973457 13147 80.91.229.12 (22 Nov 2011 14:50:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 22 15:50:50 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RSrgN-0004Bi-Il for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:50:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55968 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSrgM-0004vx-IA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:50:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37818) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSrgF-0004vg-8n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:50:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSrgD-0004Wb-CW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:50:39 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:34636) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSrgD-0004WX-7R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:50:37 -0500 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id pAMEoZ8F011232; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:50:35 -0500 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 773B0B4043; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:50:35 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:34:03 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4048=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9286 : core <4048> : streams <703815> : uri <1013190> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146143 Archived-At: >> Also if the code could be conditionalized on the problematic gnutls >> version (or at least include a comment explaining which gnutls versions >> are affected or a link to a gnutls bug-report about it, or something) >> that would be *really* handy, so that 10 years from now we can decide >> whether it can be removed. > The version I'm seeing the problem with is with 2.12.14-3 (Debian > wheezy). I'll add a comment about that. Thanks. > I can try to add some autoconf logic, too, but my autoconf-fu is weak. > (And I don't really know what the range of affected versions are...) I don't think we know enough about the problem to make autoconf rules, indeed. But we should open a bug-report with the gnutls guys and point to that bug-report from a comment in the code. Stefan