From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Minor documentation patches Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:23:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: <36291F6A-AA6C-4140-9672-370F860CD1B4@rothlis.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340130191 16122 80.91.229.3 (19 Jun 2012 18:23:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=F6thlisberger?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 19 20:23:11 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sh353-0000P1-Bn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:23:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47348 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sh353-0001AB-BL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:23:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54199) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sh350-00019g-NC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:23:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sh34z-0005PL-3a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:23:06 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:38735) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sh34y-0005P6-WE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:23:05 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q5JIN39B002457; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:23:03 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5CBFAB422C; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:23:03 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <36291F6A-AA6C-4140-9672-370F860CD1B4@rothlis.net> ("David =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=F6thlisberger=22's?= message of "Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:36:27 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4255=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4255> : streams <770549> : uri <1143621> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151028 Archived-At: > I submitted 3 rather minor documentation patches that have sat in the > bugtracker untouched for 2 months (perhaps I should have put "[PATCH]" Yes, I'm sorry for the delay. Thanks for pinging us back. > Could someone please have a look? I did, see my other emails. > And if there's any way I can improve my bug reports or patches, do let > me know! They look great, not much you can do on your side, sadly. The best way to improve the time-to-feedback is to help us out ;-) BTW, your contributions so far have been small, so we can install them as "tiny change", but if you intend to submit more, they'll sooner or later add up to something non-trivial, in which case we'll need you to sign some copyright paperwork. If you want to get this out of the way, I can send you the relevant forms, Stefan