From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:30:32 -0400 Message-ID: References: <50258C47.3090004@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1344691841 2424 80.91.229.3 (11 Aug 2012 13:30:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 13:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: stephen@xemacs.org, vrrm00@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 11 15:30:41 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T0Bm4-00053P-6b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:30:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44292 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T0Bm3-0003p5-BJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:30:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33771) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T0Bm1-0003ov-Cz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:30:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T0Blz-0008Oj-DJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:30:37 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:57250) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T0Blz-0008Oc-9K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:30:35 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu0+4rw0x/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgcBboJkEQDozOBWIMF X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="195485451" Original-Received: from 184-175-13-49.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([184.175.13.49]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 11 Aug 2012 09:30:34 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4E90D59305; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:30:32 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <50258C47.3090004@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Sat, 11 Aug 2012 02:33:43 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:152435 Archived-At: > This would be a backward-incompatible change to the regexp engine, > wouldn't it? Clearly, we'd need to make such a change in a way that doesn't break all the existing Elisp code. Stefan