From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Feature freeze on October 1 Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:57:34 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87r4pj8rav.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1349035065 21025 80.91.229.3 (30 Sep 2012 19:57:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 19:57:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, cyd@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 30 21:57:50 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TIPe8-0000yK-0v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 21:57:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58515 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIPe2-0003rN-JX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:57:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIPdz-0003rI-S0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:57:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIPdz-0005rV-1A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:57:39 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:8888) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIPdw-0005r3-Hc; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:57:36 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09FxLT4/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiBwFugmQRAOjM4FYgwU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="200323073" Original-Received: from 69-196-180-248.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([69.196.180.248]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 30 Sep 2012 15:57:35 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C117FAE0B0; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:57:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87r4pj8rav.fsf@gnu.org> (Kenichi Handa's message of "Mon, 01 Oct 2012 00:27:04 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153774 Archived-At: > In ccl.c, ccl_driver uses DECODE_CHAR, and ccl_driver itself > has no problem because it doesn't uses a pointer into > buffer/string. But, I noticed that the callers of that > function in coding.c (decode_coding_ccl and > encode_coding_ccl) has to prepare for buffer relocation. > I've just installed a fix. Great, thank you. >> (CODING_DECODE_CHAR seems to try and handle it explicitly, but I'm not >> sure it's sufficient). > At least, it should be sufficient for pointers used by code > conversion routines. Isn't it? I have no particular reason to think it's not sufficient, but I haven't looked closely enough to convince myself that it is. Stefan