From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Info: Console Vs GUI difference? Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:02:18 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383242555 26676 80.91.229.3 (31 Oct 2013 18:02:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 18:02:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "T.V. Raman" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 31 19:02:39 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VbwZp-0000yn-6r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:02:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58687 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbwZo-0008Lc-Rn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:02:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51021) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbwZe-0008KJ-Uq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:02:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbwZX-0006jI-Kd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:02:26 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:61861) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbwZX-0006j6-GM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:02:19 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFsoXfp/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kLodwBsEtkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFsoXfp/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kLodwBsEtkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="36781940" Original-Received: from 108-161-119-233.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([108.161.119.233]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 31 Oct 2013 14:02:18 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 791DE611E1; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:02:18 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (T. V. Raman's message of "Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:21:13 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:164743 Archived-At: > And speaking of aditional emacs hooks that would help emacspeak: > 1. A hook that I can use to catch read-only errors for typing > commands -- a hook here would be a clean solution because > independent of context, I mostly want to speak the same thing > 2. Less need to advice error/ and hopefully never to advice signal -- > This one is harder because many emacs packages use signal and > error to signal conditions that should be communicated to the > average user. It seems from where I stand that both should be covered by command-error-function. So, maybe you should explain in more detail which part of command-error-function doesn't suit your need. Stefan