From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Indentation of cond forms in (Emacs) Lisp mode Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 09:34:10 -0400 Message-ID: References: <37BC56E1-3A18-46D0-8F56-F1447D18C02F@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401975386 4517 80.91.229.3 (5 Jun 2014 13:36:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 13:36:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Schwab , emacs-devel To: "Bozhidar Batsov" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 05 15:36:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WsXq4-00037C-QW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:36:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41222 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsXq4-00084c-4d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 09:36:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58122) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsXoC-00058r-PG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 09:34:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsXo3-0002TF-Nz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 09:34:20 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:24079) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsXo3-0002Re-Kf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 09:34:11 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArYGAIDvNVPO+IOj/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA0CYEXF3SCJQEBAQECAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSIBAjSGReOegeEOASpGYFqg0wh X-IPAS-Result: ArYGAIDvNVPO+IOj/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA0CYEXF3SCJQEBAQECAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSIBAjSGReOegeEOASpGYFqg0wh X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,753,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="65877950" Original-Received: from 206-248-131-163.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.131.163]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 05 Jun 2014 09:34:10 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 898EB601BB; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 09:34:10 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <37BC56E1-3A18-46D0-8F56-F1447D18C02F@gmail.com> (Bozhidar Batsov's message of "Thu, 05 Jun 2014 10:07:39 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:172363 Archived-At: >> The intention is that you do not break after cond, so it isn't treated >> specially, ie. like a normal function call. > Still, it seems a bit arbitrary. Yes. I don't think you'll find a much better answer. Stefan