From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 33% speed up in CC Mode scrolling. Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 20:44:32 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20160615222015.GA4813@acm.fritz.box> <5761FA98.2070101@gmail.com> <20160617153811.GC3316@acm.fritz.box> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466383446 17758 80.91.229.3 (20 Jun 2016 00:44:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 00:44:06 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 20 02:43:56 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bEnJc-0006i6-5Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 02:43:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40594 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEnJb-0004iq-8B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 20:43:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42295) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEnJH-0004Ee-0W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 20:43:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEnJC-00077b-Sx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 20:43:25 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:42310) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEnJC-00077W-Le for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 20:43:22 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bEnJ6-0006G6-8Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 02:43:16 +0200 Original-Received: from 45.72.244.67 ([45.72.244.67]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 02:43:16 +0200 Original-Received: from monnier by 45.72.244.67 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 02:43:16 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 45.72.244.67 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:iacQQgTq01ecg/5ruB8qy8SF+xA= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204556 Archived-At: > But is something painfully slow for many users really the right choice > of default? I don't think so. While I agree, I generally use old/slow machines and the "painfully slow" behavior is rare and should simply be considered as a bug to report and fix, rather than an unavoidable issue that should be circumvented by lowering our expectations. IOW I'm a firm believer that we can have our cake and eat it too, Stefan