From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: inform Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 11:04:43 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86lfm3k05m.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> <868si2kfg8.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> <83v9l6iv0g.fsf@gnu.org> <86r1vuit3q.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> <86mu6iilr5.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="56860"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: dieter@duenenhof-wilhelm.de (H. Dieter Wilhelm) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 08 17:05:29 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jX4Z7-000EiQ-Mj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 17:05:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59216 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jX4Z6-00085U-Nl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 11:05:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58546) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jX4YU-0007C1-Q4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 11:04:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:4966) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jX4YR-0006Pu-Vl; Fri, 08 May 2020 11:04:50 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5D4CC100FA7; Fri, 8 May 2020 11:04:46 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BD5C5100ED2; Fri, 8 May 2020 11:04:44 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1588950284; bh=aFPXrpygS7a925nWPAwppln4sDw0xLzS/NwDw5rgd0M=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=FPXuOwqQ+rB9RZpIKA6C+3GUO+ezauI4L+LoYZtAem3BAEh9Q43mNqPPkMyhjYV+e liYby+Gib5cA0OQJe3nXkkaHDRQCakBIZLebN1WGPZlxz/bbCGCSwZXFH/mgyl/Nhm oP9EwVHecGtrUo1Wawf4QWmCVCbRL9AJ8fDleTMGo0fnGe4bPvjghZBiINRHtlhmtJ mFxTpT2UlBuRPhXFtOCohV18U0Uvozrwi2sa7rWJUVlfBYGslBU3EnPlr9DmJ+GA0F ln/HjfzbJTY0YJrStBLjh3oB61F9S4C4LP7P6mqzZnNOpasLUnQkRv9TNf/egSmSAz nP70mpQD84hoQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.3.202]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 58AFC1203B5; Fri, 8 May 2020 11:04:44 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <86mu6iilr5.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> (H. Dieter Wilhelm's message of "Fri, 08 May 2020 15:45:02 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/08 10:42:27 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249285 Archived-At: > After a second thought, it might be more practical to check if a > document is coming from the `package-user-dir' or info/ and collect over > time a - hopefully - small list of none-Elisp/Emacs related documents to > filter them out. Indeed, I suspect a test like - if it's in the blacklist => don't activate - if it comes from Emacs's own directory => activate - if it comes from an ELPA package => activate - else => don't activate will be a good enough start. The blacklist should likely use regexps and will presumably start with the Ada manual and SICP. Stefan