From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Drop the Copyright Assignment requirement for Emacs Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 13:58:01 -0400 Message-ID: References: <9mmFgzvrBwjt_n_VJyaJdXINraNi5HsGpwq-0MLeKiJA7kG2BQA4uywrzjyz7lpRS0OZDpjEi8lspOKYUA7P_QsODsDew_8nbH960G55fmY=@protonmail.com> <87tv18pyh4.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83zhaih0oz.fsf@gnu.org> <83pnbegsvm.fsf@gnu.org> <83imh5hby1.fsf@gnu.org> <2e4e8ce9-d857-f3e3-31cf-a40dee67bd25@yandex.ru> <442916f9-71f6-5daf-efbf-790685765efe@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="106676"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , =?windows-1252?B?Sm/jbyBU4XZvcmE=?= , emacs-devel To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 10 19:59:03 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jXqEA-000RdD-Kq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 19:59:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60778 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXqE9-00078a-6o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 13:59:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41574) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXqDJ-00066J-CW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 13:58:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:11007) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXqDH-0003kd-H0; Sun, 10 May 2020 13:58:08 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B682380D7D; Sun, 10 May 2020 13:58:05 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F2A8780611; Sun, 10 May 2020 13:58:03 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1589133483; bh=52YaO0O1Y4fXIzv/0J6+PV+E0vft5XjjjuVtx8WxSV8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=AT2jEyqq6vF4jP13hA5Cex0OCFdSIA97SbwESjW3YlfAqSd+nvRJS2QhDjNF0DDT4 YyW+NfcHFpMk8t5/QOUjdouDXmhD60bTJH58fnzAXx+UVEnlR/bzgxwHYhJyOAfuwx mN6amt3jLQyomKSyC/onD+k8V4/vMt94dABMPFsT28GAVKoyJwMHNKW36dvAqnS2dk An9N3OuNXgXK3nMjF82pS5+I7Gf/zJhi3U/O2In7x4JkzlPlwUV4Zk+OmTFXuw35ye 1QBJrNQkeRQg6Dq8ItR2jUmMf6v2KQaOUApkMEZbFDwNVnpZGeZ8ng1i5n1ASoyRHk VdsSEnVjTTFuA== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.3.202]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CA821206B5; Sun, 10 May 2020 13:58:03 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Sun, 10 May 2020 20:42:06 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/10 12:34:28 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249688 Archived-At: > And really, do you expect to be able to enable Eglot by default > anytime soon? No, I'm just pointing out that existence of alternatives should be prevent integration. I would also say that having Eglot in core shouldn't necessarily prevent inclusion of LSP-mode in core either. I always strongly favor merging alternatives (at least by sharing as much code as possible), but there are several examples where we have such alternatives in core. E.g. expand.el -vs- skeleton.el -vs- tempo.el, perl-mode -vs- cperl-mode, pascal-mode -vs- opascal-mode, ... Stefan