From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 9ade7ea: Fix Eldoc problem when loading on Emacs 26.3 Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 19:44:24 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20200710004934.18557.69586@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200710004936.2935520A27@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <0veepjz719.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87lfjrdzna.fsf@gmail.com> <87h7ufdtyr.fsf@gmail.com> <87a707docl.fsf@gmail.com> <874kqfdmc4.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9810"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Glenn Morris , Noam Postavsky , emacs-devel To: =?windows-1252?B?Sm/jbyBU4XZvcmE=?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 11 01:45:07 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ju2hW-0002QK-OC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 01:45:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46136 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ju2hV-0001Pw-Qv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 19:45:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51232) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ju2gx-00010d-63 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 19:44:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:31303) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ju2gv-0002Op-1F; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 19:44:30 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7ED9B80382; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 19:44:27 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C2F9180723; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 19:44:25 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1594424665; bh=ARyVpc2BY73Ag5YhYMq8S/rNXRrPDCXtBltrA4axXrw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=glai4d5BCR3cTozt6PDbdYHjdDadrP5OLc1hEnUEWFJLHpSP5ZrN1n+BiwAwTvXrC ssuIERPUruovQ0/cmX7nUNE/i7o9UfO7MLt6ZqOHijw2q6KxQan6Y+Puppd6QXMebO jqeX3AtHa/ERkScaLsmiE4HEU0rVfS7tlGO99w52Wt7Gp6RW6fxWGoyVP0RBR6ypAJ uX2Sve8HYNylXwOG9n8pDUKqJje0z07oGFTJcQCt62imerl4ImRRwaouA0Suxp+Y8D f36T89SOcFxra285aLEexCI2WugP82TjCpwUQGTVEj+6vay+eLMO+h+ucFbVJsnoTm OxeIw2TRI0swQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [157.52.23.7]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ABC9120769; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 19:44:25 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <874kqfdmc4.fsf@gmail.com> (=?windows-1252?Q?=22Jo=E3o_T=E1vo?= =?windows-1252?Q?ra=22's?= message of "Fri, 10 Jul 2020 23:41:47 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/10 17:29:13 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:252848 Archived-At: > all, a much safer bet. I've even thought about dropping the whole > "rename function to strategy" idea completely, which was just a cosmetic > way to escape the awful mind-bending confusion between "e-d-function" > singular and "e-d-functions" plural. The reason why I was happy to see you use a different name is to make it possible for eldoc--supported-p to distinguish the case where something changed the -strategy var (which shouldn't affect eldoc--supported-p) from the case where something changed the -function var. Stefan