From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Finalizing 'inhibit-automatic-native-compilation' Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 18:58:38 -0500 Message-ID: References: <837cx8cey0.fsf@gnu.org> <86wn57bmjt.fsf@stephe-leake.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25606"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Andrea Corallo , Lars Ingebrigtsen , Rob Browning To: Stephen Leake Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 28 00:59:06 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pLYcc-0006Wg-9b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 00:59:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pLYcL-00016X-Gd; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 18:58:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pLYcK-00016O-A6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 18:58:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pLYcI-00009Y-El; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 18:58:47 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4DB711000C7; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 18:58:45 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 68B50100098; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 18:58:39 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1674863919; bh=+50wOnRJ6rjgH+CiizkgxNBU6hxY+Aec0kZWslJuymw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=pyJcdjaAD+rmKhgW99EGMFsfFYHz+Y9Hp1FWmI/hMRBclZfd1hklOlQZVgE8QKi08 g8BRl4ca7KVl/eVDiPB6egXz8Yi8V46uyh1fR8TCuDp9ighYLII3OW/N1n0WfRiITN wrrjeyNmrekMdZP1NWXyFtJjBnRFd1o4+FaXCaRrDlf9hSQxqGj2vM2WQDkaem7aIM ccdGu12ZhIHBx17GEqx+WpzQ5iOab1uDPYlYKawqDj3TzwkNSz8R0hOIk9FJMIdquo nS22iQsfodDNNmmdrtlEq/WonjhiII4dwoPukhiGWetStxdT2qWZKi0GykDuqys6L0 HJDlknla1BPcQ== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.216.69]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30E9F120828; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 18:58:39 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <86wn57bmjt.fsf@stephe-leake.org> (Stephen Leake's message of "Fri, 27 Jan 2023 15:11:18 -0800") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:302694 Archived-At: >> Here are the questions I think we want to be answered to finalize the >> implementation and effects of 'inhibit-automatic-native-compilation': >> >> . Do people actually use 'inhibit-automatic-native-compilation' or >> the corresponding environment variable? If so, for what reasons, >> and why tweaking 'native-comp-eln-load-path' to direct the *.eln >> files to some other place, including the temporary-file directory, >> was not enough? > > I do. > > When running Emacs ada-mode tests, I spawn lots of Emacsen. If each one > tries to native compile stuff, it just slows down the tests. Any reason you use `inhibit-automatic-native-compilation` rather than `native-comp-deferred-compilation`? Stefan