From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: feature/type-hierarchy 8a63e50036f 1/5: * Define 'cl--type-hierarchy' and compute 'cl--typeof-types' from it Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 13:59:18 -0500 Message-ID: References: <170801660982.26727.13226947668211497607@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240215170330.82819C0F009@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37640"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 01 20:00:26 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rg87N-0009bH-NC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 20:00:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rg86R-0007Kj-IG; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 13:59:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rg86O-0007KA-Nm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 13:59:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rg86N-0004JF-4e; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 13:59:24 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C8EE8100196; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 13:59:20 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1709319559; bh=TL+qKi0uc2ILWN07dMmZCtOfZbsZlNDmEuu/VNWzczE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=fjmlKWBa1I9QwnN3eYVW0x/9v42YIMOvgddXE0agDaCVqUL+JNT52qcSMjx8tt9F7 ZpS8yplk3m+csH0HWkZfOWGjMPGqbUEi+7WK4Uzt2RWviBTTjugXUxy5zpnezaiDLd f+GskYfMhTdOI4HNi3SYIlAyXqibeyES2lKs/cpu195hM6e8ttOxKIBbYix4eePKrJ 9fxeOB6t13wsuE5JQaA4UCPaL3qD8Mjy5rx71KOo3HgWLcqIPhcAnRdZkw2k7EIsuV 2N1/JrsNN+2JfskGvnfHOmEO4QvfcRzss6AhuIJoMloMvqZwu7MG1eA4u4lMO4MN+i FKhe/DRh4Yh8w== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C51881000D6; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 13:59:19 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [23.233.149.155]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9439E120278; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 13:59:19 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Andrea Corallo's message of "Fri, 01 Mar 2024 13:12:58 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:316674 Archived-At: >>> + (symbol-with-pos keyword)) > Can't we have keyword that is a symbol-with-pos as well? I'm not sure (it depends if we agree that a `symbol-with-pos` is also a `symbol`. In practice it presumably depends on the value of `symbols-with-pos-enabled` =F0=9F=99=81), but I know that not all `symbol-with-pos`s are `keyword`s. Stefan "who thinks he would prefer that `symbols-with-pos-enabled` only affects the behavior of `eq`"