From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: feature/type-hierarchy 8a63e50036f 1/5: * Define 'cl--type-hierarchy' and compute 'cl--typeof-types' from it Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2024 15:42:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: <170801660982.26727.13226947668211497607@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240215170330.82819C0F009@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35077"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 03 21:43:18 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rgsg2-0008we-9j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 21:43:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rgsfo-00031V-QY; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 15:43:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rgsfo-00031M-3s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 15:43:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rgsfm-00018D-QS; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 15:43:03 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B0CD9806A3; Sun, 3 Mar 2024 15:43:01 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1709498576; bh=6g9pUq3qauvsJH1fb5x6U2Txzrv2naqFCUuX0BMUvzI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=aNGVxIj/cVxVk6E+63+2Qdob4V3z6++daBM1dx6JtiHI3m/FOoqi2MS4YA8J7O1Vv PEdtU4cOmruTkQU9+RddEHyr6tIBD6zXKxQFI/yvdOwfZre721foeifgoWyx05OCCx OPBucm9HvGzKUkgsDyr/1p54GtHfobvaan80/2UhVoNXOEz6W1KkAfYE99gpcGuqKp 4y4n5mowmIvJ3UaEzhUwge4uSQjx4tWDUaBMj7FDwRamCfVdCr6EAOPlRKtflOprf8 IDPlGlj2x/ySSJEsEH5u/3RVOlika9Xtf/++WTK4+dXxmk7YfmL80uxzoqb7xa4o6U MN6lEiZk58DqA== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2CBF7804BC; Sun, 3 Mar 2024 15:42:56 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [104.247.233.29]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 090461202C7; Sun, 3 Mar 2024 15:42:56 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Andrea Corallo's message of "Sun, 03 Mar 2024 13:37:57 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:316773 Archived-At: >>>>> The original was inconsistent on this, >>>> Maybe that was an oversight. >>>> Do you remember which inconsistency you had noticed in this respect? >>> I remember (symbol-with-pos symbol atom) (symbol atom), there might have >>> been others. >> I think I see. By "leaf" I really meant "non abstract": both `symbol` >> and `symbol-with-pos` describe *the* type of some objects (IOW `type-of` >> can return that symbol), as opposed to things like `sequence`, `list`, >> atom`, `number-or-marker`, ... > Ah! Mmmh then is not so simple... It's not complicated either, but I guess what you mean is that the DAG doesn't have enough info, and there I can I agree (which is why in the previous code we generated the DAG from `cl--typeof-types` instead of the reverse =F0=9F=99=82). Stefan