From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: problem with system_eol_type Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:52:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1154368366 20441 80.91.229.2 (31 Jul 2006 17:52:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:52:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mule-ja@m17n.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 31 19:52:40 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7bwJ-0002SU-8o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:52:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7bwI-0007TT-Sp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:52:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G7bw0-0007Os-78 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:52:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G7bvx-0007LU-Ot for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:52:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7bvx-0007LL-93 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:52:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.184] (helo=tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G7byf-0000yE-7t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:54:53 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([70.55.145.116]) by tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060731175204.TGVC10262.tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net@localhost>; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:52:04 -0400 Original-Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C57A38883; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:52:04 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Kenichi Handa In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:30:26 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57857 Archived-At: > Is there any good reason why Gnus uses coding systems of the form `foo' > rather than `foo-unix'? More to the point: is there any reason why any package should ever use `raw-text' (rather than, say, `binary' aka `raw-text-unix')? Stefan