From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:47:52 -0400 Message-ID: References: <45E8657D.4080202@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173797335 12598 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2007 14:48:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 13 15:48:45 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HR8If-0006nK-5k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:48:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HR8JQ-0001W3-TJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:49:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HR8J6-0001H5-UM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:48:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HR8J5-0001EM-Ti for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:48:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HR8J5-0001Da-MC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:48:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.24.67]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HR8IA-0001Xa-7P; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:47:58 -0400 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70F82CF269; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:47:57 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD613FE0; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:47:52 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7328D6CB0E; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:47:52 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Kenichi Handa's message of "Tue\, 13 Mar 2007 13\:06\:04 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67862 Archived-At: >> > One guideline is not to use encoded-kbd-mode on window system. >> But that's the only available way in w32, IIUC. > I think the bug should be fixed. Or, do you mean that it's > impossible for w32 code to do what done in > handle_one_xevent? We agree. But there's noone to implement it, AFAICT. Stefan