From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#927: vc-bzr.el with cygwin bzr Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:22:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Stefan Monnier , 927@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220982478 11765 80.91.229.12 (9 Sep 2008 17:47:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 17:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, 927@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Phillip Lord Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 09 19:48:53 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kd7KV-0003AF-Gr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:48:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44269 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kd7JV-0006jx-CG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:47:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kd7JR-0006ja-RR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:47:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kd7JQ-0006jJ-DP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:47:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41240 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kd7JQ-0006j1-3K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:47:36 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:37713) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kd7JQ-00071C-0q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:47:36 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m89HlWW6017772; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:47:33 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m89HU4bD011489; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:30:04 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:30:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 927 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 927-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B927.12209809309248 (code B ref 927); Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:30:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 927) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 9 Sep 2008 17:22:10 +0000 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca (chene.dit.umontreal.ca [132.204.246.20]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m89HM3Fi009242 for <927@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:22:07 -0700 Original-Received: from alfajor.home (vpn-132-204-232-31.acd.umontreal.ca [132.204.232.31]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m89HM2nx006672; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 13:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2C5141C69D; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 13:22:02 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Phillip Lord's message of "Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:44:11 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3099=0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:47:37 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:20402 Archived-At: > Given that the change I suggested is quite small, is there a problem > with putting it in; Yes, because I think it's just a workaround whereas a real bug fix is easy to do. Don't use a hack when you can use a clean solution. Stefan