From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: rmail-toggle-header problem Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:21:03 -0500 Message-ID: References: <862437.72141.qm@web83206.mail.mud.yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1235182915 29852 80.91.229.12 (21 Feb 2009 02:21:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:21:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org To: pandyacus@sbcglobal.net Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 21 03:23:10 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LahWD-0003hc-JC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 03:23:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34850 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LahUt-00050U-B8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:21:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LahUM-0004po-2V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:21:10 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LahUK-0004oW-Fi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:21:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35746 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LahUK-0004oQ-Cg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:21:08 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]:39924 helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LahUH-0003M0-68; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:21:05 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuwEAJ7znklLd+0i/2dsb2JhbACBbdFthA8Gg0o X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,244,1233550800"; d="scan'208";a="34171616" Original-Received: from 75-119-237-34.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.237.34]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 20 Feb 2009 21:21:04 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D5DEF8FA9; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:21:03 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <862437.72141.qm@web83206.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (Chetan Pandya's message of "Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:18:06 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109267 Archived-At: > I am also in favor of continuity with existing behaviour, unless there > is a good reason not to. More to the point, now is not the time to change the behavior of Rmail. We're in feature-freeze, or even in pretest, and we're just trying to get Rmail back to its previous featureset. Improvements will have to wait for after-23.1. Stefan