From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7408: Linux patchutils: Development of the project? Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 08:39:29 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1213200935.4147.62.camel@cyberelk.elk> <87pqu59d16.fsf@picasso.cante.net> <20101117044729.GG17341@picasso.cante.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290111280 20102 80.91.229.12 (18 Nov 2010 20:14:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 20:14:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7408@debbugs.gnu.org To: jari Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 18 21:14:36 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJAsM-0002eQ-0d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:14:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57851 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PJAsL-0004yr-6D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:14:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60298 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PJAsA-0004uq-C4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:14:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJAs8-0000m7-I8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:14:22 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58851) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJAs8-0000m3-Gc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:14:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJAWa-0006Xa-Fy; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:52:04 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:52:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7408 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7408-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7408.129010988025069 (code B ref 7408); Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:52:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7408) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2010 19:51:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJAVq-0006WI-Sj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:51:19 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJAVp-0006W6-24 for 7408@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:51:17 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id oAIJuIUv006654; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:56:19 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C4E58A82B6; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 08:39:29 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20101117044729.GG17341@picasso.cante.net> (jari's message of "Wed, 17 Nov 2010 06:47:29 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3683=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:52:04 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41735 Archived-At: > The 'return' has been integral part of 'dolist' since the start. Who cares? > | After (require 'cl), `return' gets defined and things work as you > | expect. > The implementation in subr.el::dolist does not have any support for > 'return'. Again, who cares? If you want to use `return' you need to require the package that defines it. > It is not that 'return' gets defined, but what happens is that loading > CL clobbers that current definition pf 'dolist' by overwiting it with > its own implementation: And? Why would you care? Without looking at the source code, can you tell the difference? > Naturally, loading CL also defines other things. But the fundamental > problem is two incompatible dolist implementations. You still haven't shown any evidence of incompatibility. Show me a piece of code which would work with CL's dolist (but without CL's return) and yet doesn't work with subr.el's dolist. Stefan