From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#4710: 23.1.50; Bad display of underlines crossing line boundaries Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:38:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4E75B5FE.1030208@dogan.se> <4515BD8DE6284A249A67403FC1292685@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316482748 13540 80.91.229.12 (20 Sep 2011 01:39:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 01:39:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen' , 4710@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 20 03:39:04 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5pIe-00029n-FM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 03:39:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37724 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5pId-0006qk-O7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:39:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52932) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5pIa-0006qb-PO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:39:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5pIY-0001V4-MG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:39:00 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38894) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5pIY-0001V0-HW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:38:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5pNS-0001bu-Da for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:44:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 01:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 4710 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 4710-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B4710.13164829936130 (code B ref 4710); Tue, 20 Sep 2011 01:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 4710) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Sep 2011 01:43:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5pMe-0001am-N8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:43:13 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5pMb-0001ae-1g for 4710@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:43:10 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAKDtd05FpZ7x/2dsb2JhbABChFeiaXiBUwEBBAEjMyMQCxoCGA4CAhQYDSQxh1mkJZICgSyEO4ERBKBOhEQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,408,1312171200"; d="scan'208";a="137205722" Original-Received: from 69-165-158-241.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.158.241]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 19 Sep 2011 21:38:04 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 08302591F1; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:38:03 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4515BD8DE6284A249A67403FC1292685@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:20:24 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:44:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51512 Archived-At: >> > But it does look really ugly. :-) This single behavioural=20 >> > tic is what makes underlines undesirable. If somebody had >> > a good idea how to fix this in general, that would be a win. >> Maybe someone could come up with a neater way to display "face >> continuations" (face that applies to the text where a line is >> wrapped). For underline, we could put a short bit of dotted underline >> as in: >> foo bar baz >> -------=E2=8B=AF >> toto titi tur >> =E2=8B=AF---- > Why assume that underlined whitespace should not show an underline? > Likewise for other face attributes. I believe you're confused: I'm talking about line-wrapping done by the redisplay engine. I.e. there's no newline in the above example (but there are curly arrows in the fringe instead). Stefan