From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9761: proposed list-buffers change -- revert buffer if point is in *Buffer List* buffer Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:50:28 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1318780287 13807 80.91.229.12 (16 Oct 2011 15:51:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 15:51:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9761@debbugs.gnu.org To: Zachary Kanfer Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 16 17:51:23 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RFSzh-0007Ap-PX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:51:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47460 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFSzg-0004iy-Ub for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:51:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43414) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFSzd-0004ib-EJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:51:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFSzc-0001rT-J9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:51:17 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33883) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFSzc-0001rP-GN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:51:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RFT0M-0007vr-CN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:52:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 15:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9761 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9761-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9761.131878027730438 (code B ref 9761); Sun, 16 Oct 2011 15:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9761) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Oct 2011 15:51:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RFSzd-0007ut-CF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:51:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RFSzb-0007un-Un for 9761@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:51:16 -0400 Original-Received: from dsl-67-204-8-47.acanac.net ([67.204.8.47]:61536 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFSyr-0003sJ-BE; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:50:29 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 29028660B6; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:50:28 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Zachary Kanfer's message of "Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:22:43 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:52:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52684 Archived-At: > ! (display-buffer (list-buffers-noselect files-only))) [...] > ! (if (string= (buffer-name) > ! "*Buffer List*") > ! (revert-buffer) > ! (display-buffer (list-buffers-noselect files-only)))) I don't think calling revert-buffer is right. Much better would be for list-buffer-noselect to try to preserve point when reusing a buffer rather than creating a new one. Stefan