From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: "as-is" rule
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:09:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwvsjl5ph9w.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <837h2h5ysc.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 30 Nov 2011 19:02:27 +0200")
>> I think you've hit a bug in gcc in this case: "e1 || e2" should not
>> evaluate e2 if e1 evaluates to non-0.
> This is what I always knew: that `e1 || e2 || e3' are evaluated left
> to right. But I understand the "as-is" rule relaxed that.
No, it did not (and yes Samuel, it's "as-if", not "as-is", sorry).
All the "as-if" rule says is that the assembly code may do anything it
likes as long as the result agrees with some interpretation of the
semantics. There's a lot of noise around this, but in the end it's
mostly irrelevant, all it says is: don't presume what kind of assembly
will be generated from the source code. All programming languages admit
the "as-if" rule and other than C none bother to mention it. C is
special only because it has a "low-level" history and feel which makes
many people assume many things which the semantics does not guarantee
(e.g. ((x-1)+1) may be different from x if x is a pointer to the
beginning of an object, since x-1 is undefined (or was it
"unspecified"?) in this case).
But the C semantics really does guarantee that "e1 || e2" only evaluates
e2 if e1 evaluates to 0, so the "as-if" rule is not the problem.
>> xassert ((row->enabled_p && !row->mode_line_p)
>> ? verify_row_hash (row) : 1);
> If we are dealing with a compiler bug, how can we be sure this
> expression will not hit the same bug?
We can't.
> Anyway, I eventually removed the assertion altogether, so this is a
> moot point now.
Thanks,
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-30 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-30 12:35 "as-is" rule Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-30 13:57 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-11-30 14:20 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-11-30 17:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-30 19:09 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2011-11-30 18:44 ` Samuel Bronson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jwvsjl5ph9w.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.