From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The rest of xVARs Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 08:52:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <50214432.5040906@yandex.ru> <50235543.3000501@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1344516758 29279 80.91.229.3 (9 Aug 2012 12:52:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 12:52:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs development discussions To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 09 14:52:39 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SzSEA-0001KZ-Uq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:52:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47335 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzSE6-00006i-Vf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 08:52:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzSE1-00006T-LY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 08:52:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzSE0-0004nE-I3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 08:52:29 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:36183) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzSE0-0004n9-Dx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 08:52:28 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09Ld/LR/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAScvIwULCw4mEhQYDSSIHAW6CZBEA6MzgViDBQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="195342098" Original-Received: from 75-119-242-209.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.242.209]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 09 Aug 2012 08:52:27 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 91BED599B1; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 08:52:26 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <50235543.3000501@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Antipov's message of "Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:14:27 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:152361 Archived-At: > I can't continue without solving (B|K)VARs issue, and X = B->field/ > BSET(B, field, X) is enough for my purposes; You can split the BVAR into a BGET and BSET for now. > So you should hate DEFUN which receives function pointer, Lisp_Subr name > and even a comment as parameters :-). I dislike it too, but consider them > as the smallest possible evil rather than a nightmare. I'm not fond of DEFUN, but since it's placed at the top-level, it's syntactically obvious that it's not a function call, so there's no expectation that its arguments be valid expressions. Stefan