From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2820: 23.0.91; ruby-mode binds keys it probably shouldn't Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:39:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <50458B5B.7070204@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1346769633 14522 80.91.229.3 (4 Sep 2012 14:40:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 14:40:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2820@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 04 16:40:33 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T8uIp-0004Ar-ND for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 16:40:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58955 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T8uIm-00024t-Ss for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:40:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48492) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T8uIa-0001vS-VX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:40:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T8uIM-00081n-Qb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:40:16 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57249) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T8uIM-0007zx-NE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T8uIM-0000V1-HQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 2820 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2820-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B2820.13467695681871 (code B ref 2820); Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2820) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2012 14:39:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38562 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T8uHn-0000U6-RZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:39:28 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:39497) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T8uHh-0000Tw-O0 for 2820@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:39:22 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q84EdKKo028348; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 10:39:20 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id EA0F6B40D4; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 10:39:19 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <50458B5B.7070204@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Tue, 04 Sep 2012 09:02:19 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4331=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4331> : streams <811945> : uri <1209872> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:63737 Archived-At: > Just setting forward-sexp-function value would break `up-list' and > backward-up-list', for example. That's a problem, yes. We need a better story to extend forward-sexp-function to up-list (probably with something like the addition of an up-list-function). > 2) ruby-indent-exp - because it's more useful than `prog-indent-sexp', and > the latter uses `forward-sexp'. That's fine: it's a different command, but its intention is the same. So I guess it should use command remapping. Stefan