From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16936: 24.3; lexical-let does not take function arguments into account when creating closures Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 17:26:06 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1394231233 2683 80.91.229.3 (7 Mar 2014 22:27:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 22:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16936@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jordon Biondo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 07 23:27:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WM3Ef-00025r-GV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 23:27:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38484 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WM3Ef-0002bw-0d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 17:27:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51958) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WM3EU-0002bT-Ap for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 17:27:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WM3EN-0000dt-1z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 17:27:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54102) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WM3EM-0000dp-Uf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 17:27:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WM3EM-0006US-Iq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 17:27:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 22:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16936 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16936-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16936.139423117124870 (code B ref 16936); Fri, 07 Mar 2014 22:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16936) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2014 22:26:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55284 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WM3DW-0006T3-83 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 17:26:10 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:26891) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WM3DT-0006Sv-C8 for 16936@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 17:26:08 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFMCppy/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLLQcHCxQYDSSIHgbBLY1VgzUDiGGcGYFegxU X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFMCppy/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLLQcHCxQYDSSIHgbBLY1VgzUDiGGcGYFegxU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="50834184" Original-Received: from 76-10-154-114.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.154.114]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 07 Mar 2014 17:26:06 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 9509F60C72; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 17:26:06 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Jordon Biondo's message of "Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:54:24 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:86639 Archived-At: > I assume this is not the desired behavior. Indeed. If you use `lexical-binding' instead of `lexical-let' you won't suffer from those problems. `lexical-let' is on the way to deprecation and the problem you describe has affected `lexical-let' "for ever", so I don't think anyone will care to fix it. Stefan