From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-24 r116836: Fix keyword argument parsing. Please bootstrap. Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:12:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <532F9AFF.1020108@dancol.org> <532F9F52.8020906@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395667159 20119 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2014 13:19:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:19:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 24 14:19:27 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WS4mk-0004N5-GB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:19:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36306 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS4mj-0002Lv-NT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:19:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38034) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS4m6-0000IH-H1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:19:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS4fr-0007Be-7x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:12:26 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:48919) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS4fr-0007BT-2X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:12:19 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s2ODCXnq027769; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:12:34 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 66F8C600A2; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:12:15 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <532F9F52.8020906@dancol.org> (Daniel Colascione's message of "Sun, 23 Mar 2014 19:58:26 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4891=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4891> : inlines <634> : streams <1143847> : uri <1708523> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170909 Archived-At: > Or we can just use plist-member. plist-member produces code that's only > 10% slower than the old code and 7% larger: we have an opcode for memq, > but not for plist-member. Is that performance difference small enough > for emacs-24? Yes, that would be fine, thank you, Stefan