From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: find-file-project Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:04:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86pp1j4ejm.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55F899EA.7050700@yandex.ru> <86lhc73wog.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55F8F2FA.6060902@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1442408672 23673 80.91.229.3 (16 Sep 2015 13:04:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:04:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stephen Leake , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 16 15:04:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcCNm-0003JW-M5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:04:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50654 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcCNh-0002yf-5d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:04:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46980) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcCNe-0002yY-95 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:04:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcCNa-00038O-Gp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:04:10 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:33330) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcCNa-00037x-CV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:04:06 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t8GD43Cm008593; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:04:04 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 82EE06612A; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:04:04 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <55F8F2FA.6060902@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Wed, 16 Sep 2015 07:41:30 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV5431=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5431> : inlines <3805> : streams <1506161> : uri <2041707> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190003 Archived-At: >>> I don't think each implementation should do its own completing-read. >>> Rather, they should just return the completion table from a generic >>> method. E.g. (cl-defmethod project-file-completion-table ...). 100% agreement. Stefan