From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problems with syntax-ppss: Was [... Apply `comment-depth' text properties when calling `back_comment'.] Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:40:45 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20160308183010.GB6269@acm.fritz.box> <20160308200753.GC6269@acm.fritz.box> <20160309104900.GA3948@acm.fritz.box> <20160309141930.GC3948@acm.fritz.box> <20160309193758.GH3948@acm.fritz.box> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457559669 10283 80.91.229.3 (9 Mar 2016 21:41:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 21:41:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 09 22:40:56 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1adlqh-0008Rt-LU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 22:40:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44697 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adlqh-00039o-04 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:40:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42153) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adlqd-00039X-3v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:40:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adlqZ-0000Pj-So for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:40:51 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:45261) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adlqZ-0000PZ-6X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:40:47 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.DIT.UMontreal.CA (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id u29Lf7ne024792; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 16:41:07 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 6AADE6030E; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 16:40:45 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20160309193758.GH3948@acm.fritz.box> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Wed, 9 Mar 2016 19:37:58 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5605=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5605> : inlines <4472> : streams <1600332> : uri <2162204> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201330 Archived-At: >> >> ...., so if you have a problem with the implementation, fix it (or >> >> report it as a bug, at the very least) and everyone else will benefit. >> > Perhaps you could fix the problems I've identified here and in my last >> > email. >> Why would I bother, since I don't even know of any real use case where >> those problems are triggered? > OK, fine. So we go with my approach to back_comment, then? Why? > By the way, have you had a look at my patch, yet, Yes, and I didn't like it, hence this thread. > or even tried it out? No, I trust you that it works. I just don't like the way it works. Stefan