From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el? Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:36:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: <56F42269.10400@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1458851788 3587 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2016 20:36:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 20:36:28 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 24 21:36:19 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ajBzO-0004FG-OU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 21:36:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52642 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajBzN-0000KK-Ch for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:36:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56155) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajBzJ-0000Jn-Fz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:36:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajBzG-0005pW-Ap for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:36:13 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:49694) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajBzG-0005pI-4F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:36:10 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ajBzE-0004Ah-Jd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 21:36:08 +0100 Original-Received: from 69-196-182-150.dsl.teksavvy.com ([69.196.182.150]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 21:36:08 +0100 Original-Received: from monnier by 69-196-182-150.dsl.teksavvy.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 21:36:08 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 69-196-182-150.dsl.teksavvy.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:pXthjwBmJvzYNGt1qoVrpd/wRuE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202195 Archived-At: >>> (Stefan, for example, your emails are tagged with "Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) >>> Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux)"). Has there been complaints about Gnus >>> doing that? >> I never liked it, but admittedly, I never complained about it. > May I ask why you do not like this behaviour? What stands against it? That's just a leak of private information. Of course, when compared to the crapload of private info most systems send out at any opportunity nowadays, this is very minor, obviously. Stefan