From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24030: 25.0.95; mouse-drag-region regression Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 16:16:01 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87y44x2s7v.fsf@gmail.com> <83wpkgz83a.fsf@gnu.org> <871t2mw6el.fsf@gmail.com> <83twfgv76y.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1m4utkc.fsf@gnu.org> <83zip7t9a7.fsf@gnu.org> <83invvt68u.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1469391448 15842 80.91.229.3 (24 Jul 2016 20:17:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 20:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 24030@debbugs.gnu.org, agrambot@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 24 22:17:16 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bRPpr-0003fF-RA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 22:17:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57344 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRPpq-00051P-IJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 16:17:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43691) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRPpj-00051J-SR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 16:17:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRPpe-0006Fd-Rb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 16:17:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51933) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRPpe-0006FZ-O7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 16:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bRPpe-0005k0-EU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 16:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 20:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24030 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24030-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24030.146939137122002 (code B ref 24030); Sun, 24 Jul 2016 20:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24030) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jul 2016 20:16:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36037 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bRPop-0005im-Ek for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 16:16:11 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:31465) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bRPon-0005iY-EG for 24030@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 16:16:10 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A5FgA731xV/6SNCkxcgxCEAoVVwD6CTQQCAoE8PBEBAQEBAQEBgQpBBYNdAQEDAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSINwjPIwEBAQEBAQQBAQEBHos6gT0Bg0cHhC0Fsz+BRSOCF4F9IoJ4AQEB X-IPAS-Result: A0A5FgA731xV/6SNCkxcgxCEAoVVwD6CTQQCAoE8PBEBAQEBAQEBgQpBBYNdAQEDAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSINwjPIwEBAQEBAQQBAQEBHos6gT0Bg0cHhC0Fsz+BRSOCF4F9IoJ4AQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,465,1427774400"; d="scan'208";a="249122022" Original-Received: from 76-10-141-164.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.141.164]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 24 Jul 2016 16:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 36E1564CA6; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 16:16:01 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83invvt68u.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 24 Jul 2016 18:17:53 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:121498 Archived-At: >> Looks fine to me, tho I don't think we should use with-selected-window >> here, but only with-current-buffer. > How is the latter different in this particular context? The end result will probably be very similar in practice, but if you look at the definition of with-selected-window and of all the functions it calls, you'll see that with-current-buffer is super-extra lean in comparison. And in the current situation all we care about is to set the buffer-local value of a variable, so the window is of no importance (other than to find the relevant buffer). Stefan