From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: xr Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 19:14:28 -0500 Message-ID: References: <5D000EFF-1804-4836-86D9-B4F01A9F1064@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="127616"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Mattias =?windows-1252?Q?Engdeg=E5rd?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 06 01:14:47 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1grArW-000X3K-4J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 01:14:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42782 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grArV-0003wL-4A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 19:14:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51759) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grArP-0003w8-Av for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 19:14:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grArO-0003F4-Is for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 19:14:39 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:48441) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grArM-00038i-R3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 19:14:38 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id x160ETCb025033; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 19:14:29 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 860A36A060; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 19:14:28 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <5D000EFF-1804-4836-86D9-B4F01A9F1064@acm.org> ("Mattias =?windows-1252?Q?Engdeg=E5rd=22's?= message of "Wed, 6 Feb 2019 01:02:38 +0100") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6476=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6476> : inlines <7011> : streams <1812200> : uri <2791514> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:233020 Archived-At: > I have no push access to elpa.git. Should I request it? If you intend to keep actively maintaining the package, then it would make sense, yes. > The source could live directly in elpa.git instead of being an external > package as far as I am concerned. Do you have any preference? If the elpa.git repository can be the official "upstream" then it avoids the need to keep it in sync, so that's what I recommend, but it's up to you. > Regarding the possible mail loop: I haven't observed it before. > If it keeps causing trouble, I'll investigate. I'll let you know if it re-occurs. Stefan