From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dedicated window for *log-edit-files* Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 13:43:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: <23322134-8c55-2612-41e0-8bd56e347020@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="181367"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: =?windows-1252?B?Sm/jbyBU4XZvcmE=?= , emacs-devel To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 27 18:44:16 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iOmaK-000kyi-Nw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 18:44:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46268 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iOmaJ-000510-IW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 13:44:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59668) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iOmZb-0004oC-Oh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 13:43:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iOmZa-0008Ok-He for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 13:43:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:47014) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iOmZY-0008NW-4i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 13:43:24 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 39BD244949E; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 13:43:23 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 37808442486; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 13:43:22 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1572198202; bh=QlA4WZwXtTTkddBinQawp2G1Ri1xcENshtac8LwniJE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=dmiKzlKg8DexTcFzWrk9K5cGyS+V9YxDywGkQaoKkycJ0VLs8smZ9Mf8uPj6OH7m+ w4rAf2JXs6NfMsU42OmTA5vBXhs+fYlaXiw+Yk7GW3gpJb2aNRD/5UcfVU7jBpEeKV lf2jaCnYvq2lLlhbNqXMFVqW6GQL7AefT0PV+RWfy7NVM2cz0OzRyvTnPW6DYKfqq4 fVvAorJIcsxpp6X+IW1eGKqaOd4fX1JAqjIJ3NkNwVXBc5XJd6a+ECVtEYg4fw06ZU HufswluHJU9BsBgoZ9L2U656+aIX0+KXl08YioSSZJVEu63Pf3aiAwDIZIXRX4lBi8 Hk+5soE1Pm2nA== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [216.154.37.243]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A41E71202F8; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 13:43:21 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <23322134-8c55-2612-41e0-8bd56e347020@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sun, 27 Oct 2019 08:49:19 +0100") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:241521 Archived-At: >> It should never appear on a separate frame, IIRC (that's the >> "-same-frame" part of cvs-pop-to-buffer-same-frame). > 'display-buffer-pop-up-frame' is a 'display-buffer-fallback-action' so > "never" is not necessarily "never". I know, but if it's always set as dedicated and will only be shown in its own frame as a last recourse, then it's a good indication that the original coder wanted it to be dedicated even if not shown in its own frame ;-) Stefan