From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ~Make emacs friendlier: package documentation [POC CODE INCLUDED] Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 09:11:25 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20201015190929.gdvx7j2yukcdcoaw@E15-2016.optimum.net> <83pn5jwav0.fsf@gnu.org> <20201015194132.jdn3e2v62vfvh7ju@E15-2016.optimum.net> <83imbawu6y.fsf@gnu.org> <20201016073432.4bmahi4jna2xxayl@E15-2016.optimum.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10261"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Boruch Baum Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 18 15:12:21 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kU8U0-0002b6-Uy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:12:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36154 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kU8Tv-000121-O4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 09:12:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57626) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kU8TE-0000ac-Fr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 09:11:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:25957) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kU8TC-0002mg-It; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 09:11:31 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C3B9980C96; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 09:11:28 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8D45380855; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 09:11:27 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1603026687; bh=zM+psiJxyp+NqgU+7cmBP1trWoeHZGZ97raLicdjKfk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=k/xlvSOsMahsahOBKJOoHnpdmoFU1viDqmEvRIblANoCroJOAXNj8aUZnVIDwZnrG 6nOV0StiMdVNwSRCUGhxpWKa87YbgIWzpSfkxB6IM8MRtnrISex+kCiqqKbyVpn9Zt n5/7zdN4DVnZ8/KbT0+0h84Z4K8fhgaLjYBoIOguANh3QtcgqOwrlid+NP4xJB1dE8 n4A4N4wlObQiO/Tz4R9U8Tm4wRYnLi40SO1KUqFwrJ67rAEtJqP7ZXUs9QLfT9bR4F y9FteTBzINNgLbcogsU1Eqx+0moywuweClFYmA+rUjE6eO9vK84wq1yYIHagIRMC9Q jUt5Ou8iup6mA== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [157.52.9.240]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CA401202E4; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 09:11:27 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20201016073432.4bmahi4jna2xxayl@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Fri, 16 Oct 2020 03:34:32 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/18 09:11:28 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:258021 Archived-At: > 1) I share the sentiment about consolidating the help/describe commands, > and have no objection to the feature being accessed via a link in > describe-package (ie. no direct dedicated keybinding). IIUC your pack-doc provides a superset of what `C-h P` provides. So what would be the downside(s) of replacing `C-h P` with your packdoc? IOW what would be the advantage of adding a link in `C-h P` to your system, instead of just replacing `C-h P` with your system? Stefan