From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master ff4de1b: Fix quoting style in Lisp comments Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 08:42:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20210912165141.9491.52637@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210912165143.5BC1E20A5E@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <47d6e9a6-f334-eda9-2e08-0a946e51fc4a@yandex.ru> <83v934emk7.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfy8d7oo.fsf@gnus.org> <9194fc93-fb9c-000f-a35a-321ddd259893@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28919"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Eli Zaretskii , Dmitry Gutov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 15 14:43:41 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mQUGL-0007G3-2K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 14:43:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45166 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQUGK-0006fY-4O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 08:43:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40704) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQUFG-0005Dn-3D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 08:42:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:7731) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQUFB-0001SL-Sl; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 08:42:32 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C8EE8100181; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 08:42:32 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3293110012C; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 08:42:31 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1631709751; bh=BMxj7yZFYl4WexnE8zHm0po9+i6yPHkS6yvOPZgOJcs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=elTnFytEkyDUN+T1DB76RCMRUBxposorVslaIpWntw9N5Y1K4iTl2UkgVpfXiix9v y2BKAvE6vxkp9q5NmdlQqXjkm88iA5RdoZHBV5SzgRa6uBk/ecKgKm8HeNFiMuslCH Lxr5fbZW2SEgn4J279mIhzuejNDYt8bM7Ad3weBXValGAAsd8MrGZG4qKpkliGmCbf 9nDzrY9UXY99sehf4td91JLD+AF55HSWRB1g+G+kF0KNKLTLakXoZY1JE7iX/Ptvas upf/sp8mkwy31zR1/HzZmNWkypZMz8yVt5GB6woyeepzUrL/MYfhj2on9rgX7Vkdxi i/k/vq1E4uSGg== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.241.23]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D79DA120296; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 08:42:23 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (martin rudalics's message of "Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:27:40 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -23 X-Spam_score: -2.4 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.4 / 5.0 requ) DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:274738 Archived-At: martin rudalics [2021-09-15 11:27:40] wrote: >>>> What would happen when commenting code out/in? >>> I don't think the `...' vs '...' quoting style is affected by this (not >>> vice versa). >> That last "not" was supposed to be "nor". > If the rule is that comments should use '...' rather than `...', > commenting code out/in is affected by that rule. I can't see why: - the rule would presumably only apply to actual prose comments, not to commented out code. - code uses neither `...' nor '...' (except for the content of docstrings, admittedly). Stefan