From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master f8b2a01a9e: * lisp/shell.el (shell): Query shell file name from `interactive` Date: Sun, 29 May 2022 13:38:30 -0400 Message-ID: References: <165365729037.13166.16983049289085077158@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220527131450.B347BC01683@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87zgj2vwtz.fsf@gmx.de> <87v8tpwrzq.fsf@gmx.de> <87leukw9ca.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25861"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 29 19:40:50 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nvMuH-0006YK-OE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 29 May 2022 19:40:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45400 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nvMuG-0001NF-8S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 29 May 2022 13:40:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45884) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nvMsK-0000do-GR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 May 2022 13:38:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:25168) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nvMsD-0001dO-8g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 May 2022 13:38:48 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 026278081D; Sun, 29 May 2022 13:38:40 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 59B7D80762; Sun, 29 May 2022 13:38:31 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1653845911; bh=IYe6aANu6YWajajj6wlqgFzkp2nQD3YXdRxZ7Waa40g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=QqE7C0oU8G0NRv7QPDJEA0TokXX1Q5vXzUaPdYifchjrT6U5SFTq2ezWQzV/O3D/d 6cWwKp/XYg3NqQl0REgodlRCPmS95Zq5c6aXefAUf5T/qGYqrzTsHbzPSNvZzFgukB 3lndFage21GeaH/tCAQzzaXsP/8eqFSROud6g/B2msOd6B3XQPw4wL5QIr4RzMHDwx TOfol+oq8djjn0ns7L+b6hwWOgUdkiGCZ0A5OqmpCk6HCYWcVLod+NIukulxloBtK1 eObgPboC79SYwtdvysurt3wWLeYTDMAfwnSrmBbsvj04BwhEcgc6VrYKBcGVevADtE ROh4gcCScc/Wg== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.221.51]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C8A412031C; Sun, 29 May 2022 13:38:31 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87leukw9ca.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Sun, 29 May 2022 19:13:25 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:290357 Archived-At: >> Cure what? > I've tested the patch now, it looks correct. Great, thanks, pushed. >>> Anyway, it would be an incompatible (but appreciated) change. >> What change are you referring to? > Forget it. I hoped, that if you re-use the *shell* buffer, which has an > exited shell, that this buffer would change it's default-directory to > the default-directory of the current buffer when the shell is > re-invoked. Ah... yes, I see what you mean, indeed, I've wished for that (and not only for remote shells). Stefan