From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gnus makes emacs lose response Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:02:46 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87u035b5ly.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87psdtb503.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1159023806 2660 80.91.229.2 (23 Sep 2006 15:03:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 15:03:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, sdl.web@gmail.com, storm@cua.dk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 23 17:03:21 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GR91w-0002VC-Om for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:03:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GR91w-0002QI-FQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:03:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GR91m-0002Pu-LM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:02:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GR91k-0002Pi-Vg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:02:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GR91k-0002Pf-To for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:02:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.34] (helo=tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GR95h-0003mi-Tj; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:06:54 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([70.53.192.222]) by tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060923150245.HZUC29052.tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net@localhost>; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:02:45 -0400 Original-Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 51BA39CE0; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:02:46 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Fri\, 22 Sep 2006 23\:34\:24 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60137 Archived-At: > Oh I see, it's because I haven't updated the code in response to the > following change: > 2004-08-19 Kim F. Storm > * process.c (wait_reading_process_input): Clean up. > Add wait_for_cell, wait_proc, and just_wait_proc args > to avoid overloading `read_kbd' and `do_display' args. > Change read_kbd arg to int. All callers changed. > So I should probably check wait_proc instead. > Would you please make whatever change is needed? We're talking about a local change which I have no intention to install in Emacs-CVS, or at least not for Emacs-22. Although maybe it could be added but controlled by a compilation flag such as ENABLE_CHECKING or DEBUG. Stefan