From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problems with the url package on w32? Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:31:20 -0500 Message-ID: References: <45887987.3040105@student.lu.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1166743911 973 80.91.229.10 (21 Dec 2006 23:31:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:31:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 22 00:31:50 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GxXO9-0008Fa-LE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:31:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GxXO8-0000yp-UG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:31:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GxXNl-0000po-P0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:31:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GxXNj-0000mP-I0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:31:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GxXNi-0000lR-OL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:31:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [83.228.153.77] (helo=alfajor.home) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GxXNi-0004l6-BG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:31:22 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 998101C620; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:31:20 -0500 (EST) Original-To: "Juanma Barranquero" In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Thu\, 21 Dec 2006 23\:56\:21 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64079 Archived-At: >> I.e. C-c C-a fails to apply the hunk (i.e. doesn't change the buffer at >> all), and correctly tells the user about this failure? >> >> If so, it's a "minor" bug. > No. C-c C-a says "hunk applied" (something like that) and the hunk is > *not* applied. Then it's not like 3 and it's a major bug. If it says "applied" it should have been applied. >> I'd be interested to learn more about it, so please send me the data next >> time you encounter such a case. > I'll do. Thanks, Stefan