From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: dbusbind.c patch, fixes possible segfault Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:12:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: <874pa5ltgh.fsf@localhorst.mine.nu> <871w59d7tq.fsf@gmx.de> <87y77hdqu8.fsf@localhorst.mine.nu> <87abjwtgrr.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208204140 32675 80.91.229.12 (14 Apr 2008 20:15:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:15:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 14 22:16:09 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JlV32-0002VU-Et for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:13:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlV2O-0005Ow-1g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:12:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlV2J-0005Ly-NH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:12:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlV2H-0005HD-So for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:12:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlV2H-0005Gz-PN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:12:17 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JlV2H-0006nB-N9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:12:17 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Al0FAG5XA0hMCqsI/2dsb2JhbACBXqlb X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,656,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="18493797" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca (HELO smtp.teksavvy.com) ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 14 Apr 2008 16:12:17 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([76.10.171.8]) by smtp.teksavvy.com (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id UYA03017; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:12:17 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C15997F3C; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:12:16 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87abjwtgrr.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:47:52 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95207 Archived-At: > Btw, when you have signed the papers, you should have write access to > the Emacs repository, shouldn't you? Not really: signing paperwork only means that your code is legally acceptable. But we may decide not to trust you w.r.t quality. If you do have a fair bit of code already installed in Emacs (e.g. a package), then as a general rule I'd most likely give out write-access. Stefan