From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help
Subject: Re: Are there any problems with lexical-let or other cl-macros???
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:44:07 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <jwvr5izytwc.fsf-monnier+gnu.emacs.help@gnu.org>
References: <5ad73987-3540-44a3-b4b1-b83c92d92526@q23g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
	<fb418749-65c8-460a-bdd6-a354b1940f68@u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291847793 27340 80.91.229.12 (8 Dec 2010 22:36:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 22:36:33 +0000 (UTC)
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 08 23:36:29 2010
Return-path: <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1PQSce-0003lc-F7
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:36:28 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49017 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1PQScd-00017B-Hz
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:36:27 -0500
Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help
Original-Lines: 9
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:44:07 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org;
	posting-host="5z3mbmgF6aDw6xCuz7tUbQ"; 
	logging-data="15434"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18WXRCOJjo31RdwWBK+Zviy"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:O2hc/OpU+wlX0id3dhfLw+lumoE=
	sha1:Www9yFZlZzNIKMJUocYETQbxRZs=
Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:179861
X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:76140
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help/76140>

>> What I don't understand is that simply replacing let with lexical-let
>> will solve the problem.
> To be more precise, it would exchange such a problem with a memory
> leak problem (`lexical-let' leaks memory).

In which sense does lexical-let leak memory?


        Stefan