From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8651: `raise' properties on NextStep Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:03:18 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309007067 11569 80.91.229.12 (25 Jun 2011 13:04:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 13:04:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8651@debbugs.gnu.org, Adrian Robert To: Alp Aker Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 25 15:04:22 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QaSX7-000422-Tp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 15:04:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36728 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QaSX6-000491-VE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:04:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59988) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QaSWr-00048o-5k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:04:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QaSWp-0001Jq-JR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:04:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36808) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QaSWp-0001Jc-Dn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:04:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QaSWo-0000eX-GV; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 13:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8651 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,ns X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8651-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8651.13090070072457 (code B ref 8651); Sat, 25 Jun 2011 13:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2011 13:03:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QaSWE-0000da-G8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:03:26 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QaSWC-0000dH-Lg; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:03:25 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAAHcBU5MCqDH/2dsb2JhbABTEKc3eIh0wXCGMASeEYNWUw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,424,1304308800"; d="scan'208";a="117112910" Original-Received: from 76-10-160-199.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.160.199]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 25 Jun 2011 09:03:18 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 9666A58FD6; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:03:18 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Alp Aker's message of "Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:21:24 -0400 (EDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:04:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:47453 Archived-At: forcemerge 8651 8913 thanks >> Thanks for the bug report and diagnostic, which sounds just >> right. Hopefully someone familiar with the NS code will find the time to >> write an actual patch for it. > I studied the NS code some and wrote up a patch. I posted it in the thread > for bug 8913, as that concerns the same issue and was opened yesterday. > (I'm noting the connection here to make sure this bug also gets closed if > the patch is accepted.) Thank you very much, could some NS guy confirm it's right and install it? Stefan