From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The `link' face. Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:08:30 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310143135 3338 80.91.229.12 (8 Jul 2011 16:38:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 16:38:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 08 18:38:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfE4p-0001I4-DQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 18:38:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49805 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfE4n-0003UU-V2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:38:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52141) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfDbV-0004fI-13 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:08:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfDbT-0003fo-KT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:08:32 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:53311 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfDbT-0003fk-B1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:08:31 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EADsrF05MCqt8/2dsb2JhbABSp0d4iHvCJYY4BJ59hC8 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,500,1304308800"; d="scan'208";a="123816918" Original-Received: from 76-10-171-124.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.171.124]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 08 Jul 2011 12:08:30 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 6A4A859160; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 12:08:30 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Fri, 8 Jul 2011 16:33:57 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141807 Archived-At: > I think the "blue (or other different color) with an underline for > mouse highlighting" that are used by some designers have been found to > be less efficient and is regarded as a bad accessability choice. (In Clearly it has to depend on the particular use, because it can render the text more legible, which is more efficient if the point is mostly for people to read the text rather than to follow the link. Stefan