From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11594: message-send-and-exit now fails Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 21:28:27 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87y5o869yf.fsf@rho.meyering.net> <87bol4urtv.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87ehq09o3g.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1338514172 28035 80.91.229.3 (1 Jun 2012 01:29:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 01:29:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Achim Gratz , 11594@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 01 03:29:31 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SaGgF-0005H8-3i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 03:29:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59226 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SaGgE-0005bx-H1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 21:29:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47126) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SaGgB-0005bp-Fe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 21:29:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SaGg8-00055l-VI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 21:29:27 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42967) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SaGg8-00055W-Rf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 21:29:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SaGhh-0002kA-IW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 21:31:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 01:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11594 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11594-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11594.133851423110509 (code B ref 11594); Fri, 01 Jun 2012 01:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11594) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jun 2012 01:30:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52513 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SaGhD-0002jS-8S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 21:30:31 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:28771) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SaGgt-0002iy-J6 for 11594@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 21:30:30 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09FpYCB/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiBwFugmQRAOjM4FYgwU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="185408208" Original-Received: from 69-165-128-129.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.128.129]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 31 May 2012 21:28:28 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 9BEA958CDD; Thu, 31 May 2012 21:28:27 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Thu, 31 May 2012 22:01:03 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:60588 Archived-At: > There are two differences: > - (cons 'macro #[nil ...]) vs '(macro . #[nil ...]) (a performance > regression) > - (m) is not macro-expanded Actually, I think his tests are buggy. When I try it on Emacs-24 and Emacs-23, the macro is not expanded either. As for the performance, the difference only applies to non-toplevel defmacros. Stefan