From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12254: 24.2; completion fails backward-char Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:17:27 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1345652267 731 80.91.229.3 (22 Aug 2012 16:17:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12254@debbugs.gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 22 18:17:48 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T4Dco-0006Ma-Ks for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 18:17:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59633 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4Dcn-00013W-2j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:17:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45938) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4Dcg-00011t-4b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:17:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4Dcf-0003s8-4H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:17:37 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34027) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4Dcf-0003rx-0k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:17:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T4Dd3-0002xn-Tn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12254 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12254-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12254.134565227511378 (code B ref 12254); Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12254) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2012 16:17:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43573 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T4Dcx-0002xT-F4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:17:55 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:14993) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T4Dcw-0002xN-9g for 12254@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:17:54 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09MCpcJ/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIWAQVWIxALNBIUGA0kiCG6CZBEA6MzgViDBQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="196442561" Original-Received: from 76-10-151-9.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.151.9]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 22 Aug 2012 12:17:27 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4873658EB4; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:17:27 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:40:25 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:63395 Archived-At: Thanks for those bug reports, Leo. I'm probably to blame for most/all of those completion problems, but I'm just coming back from a vacation and have to prepare for the "beginning of the end of the semester" (for reasons of student strikes (tho I guess it's probably more due to government's obtuseness), we're about to resume classes for the last 4 weeks of the winter semester ;-). So, I'll try to look at it ASAP, but you may have to wait a week or two. Stefan