From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: search files with conversion but fundamental mode, no handlers, no file-local vars Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:52:56 -0500 Message-ID: References: <3D2A507FA3EE44909DF7CA025897BFC3@us.oracle.com> <83txrgmtof.fsf@gnu.org> <615E3EC604F94336B49A1812AC076EF8@us.oracle.com> <9E912F79068C4D81A99CB0BCD286D970@us.oracle.com> <9B23B2D4E92A4AE7A7C7961F960BB0D1@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356065589 4837 80.91.229.3 (21 Dec 2012 04:53:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 04:53:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Eli Zaretskii' , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 21 05:53:24 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tlubs-0004H7-5a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 05:53:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58181 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tlube-0000RR-E4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:53:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TlubZ-0000R9-CS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:53:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TlubX-0007Oo-LY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:53:05 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:28007) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TlubR-0007OU-UQ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:52:57 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09FxLDj/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiBwFugmQRAOIQppxgViDBw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="210480171" Original-Received: from 69-196-176-227.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.176.227]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 20 Dec 2012 23:52:57 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E5A4058EA5; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:52:56 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <9B23B2D4E92A4AE7A7C7961F960BB0D1@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Thu, 20 Dec 2012 20:02:20 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155714 Archived-At: > I still think it could also help to make clear more of the things that > `i-f-c' inhibits, i-f-c does not inhibit any of those things, because those things apply to simply fundamentally different operations. Try to think of how i-f-c could set the buffer's mode and the consequences for the various possible use cases, and you'll see that it simply would be wrong. Stefan