From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: eww Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:19:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87d2rkb1pi.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87fvwfa3ev.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371587024 25679 80.91.229.3 (18 Jun 2013 20:23:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:23:44 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 18 22:23:45 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Up2RL-0002kl-FH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:23:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58363 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Up2RL-0003FG-33 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:23:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51523) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Up2NB-0005dn-4G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:19:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Up2N9-0008B9-NK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:19:25 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:39428) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Up2N9-0008B0-KJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:19:23 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.DIT.UMontreal.CA (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r5IKJLdd025552; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:19:21 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id F0BA6B4178; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:19:21 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:00:52 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4613=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4613> : streams <984448> : uri <1451721> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:160607 Archived-At: > At least I would prefer undo/redo to go back and forth in the history of > the current eww buffer, and an explicit "browse in new eww buffer" > command. Agreed. I don't think creating a new buffer for every page is a good idea. Also going back to a previously displayed page should be "immediate" and not require any network communication. You might start with something like: (push (cons (buffer-string) (buffer-local-variables)) eww-history) > Speaking of conveniences, could `next-error' and `previous-error' move > between anchors? Sounds like a bad idea. Stefan