From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GNU Emacs-libnettle-libhogweed integration patch v1 Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 18:58:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <877gdqrc9u.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87mwmmp05f.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87fvsdpato.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <8738oc20xk.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1381186700 13742 80.91.229.3 (7 Oct 2013 22:58:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 22:58:20 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 08 00:58:19 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VTJkp-0000lk-0g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:58:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33778 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTJko-00062t-Mk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 18:58:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60287) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTJke-00060Q-St for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 18:58:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTJkX-0000c2-Jw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 18:58:08 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:23870) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTJkX-0000bt-FV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 18:58:01 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFHO+K8t/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYoCws0EhQYDYhCBsEtjWGDKQOkeoFegxM X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFHO+K8t/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYoCws0EhQYDYhCBsEtjWGDKQOkeoFegxM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="34975877" Original-Received: from 206-248-175-45.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.175.45]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 07 Oct 2013 18:54:22 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 866D96049A; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 18:58:00 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8738oc20xk.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Mon, 07 Oct 2013 18:03:51 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:163980 Archived-At: > If I changed my proposal to use the GnuTLS interface functions, so no > new library dependencies are added, would it be acceptable? It'd be a bit less bad, but basically the main problems remain: - no clear and concrete use-case. - I want these things to go through an FFI. - I don't want to have an OpenPGP implementation to maintain. Stefan