From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Redisplay problems? Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:37:49 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ppljg4ti.fsf@kanru-mozilla.corp.tpe1.mozilla.com> <5329C53B.3030008@gmx.at> <532ABA60.7000003@gmx.at> <83siqc7n87.fsf@gnu.org> <83a9ck6lzf.fsf@gnu.org> <83eh1v5y53.fsf@gnu.org> <83y5024r1w.fsf@gnu.org> <532D95E2.2000001@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395503135 11960 80.91.229.3 (22 Mar 2014 15:45:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:45:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 22 16:45:39 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WRO78-0000pj-Sg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:45:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57369 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRO78-00023p-HT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:45:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45516) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRO6u-0001uB-5f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:45:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRO6k-0007Wr-M7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:45:24 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:13223) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRO6k-0007Wn-IZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:45:14 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Al8FABK/CFHAqyMT/2dsb2JhbABEj0SvShdzgh4BAQQBViMQCzQSFBgNEAETiB4GwS2RCgOOGJhAgxM X-IPAS-Result: Al8FABK/CFHAqyMT/2dsb2JhbABEj0SvShdzgh4BAQQBViMQCzQSFBgNEAETiB4GwS2RCgOOGJhAgxM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="52968282" Original-Received: from 192-171-35-19.cpe.pppoe.ca (HELO pastel.home) ([192.171.35.19]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 22 Mar 2014 11:45:14 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 304B2600A9; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:37:49 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <532D95E2.2000001@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:53:38 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170805 Archived-At: >> AFAIK iconified frames don't get expose events. > At least on Windows we have to cater for obscured frames. But as long as they're obscured, they don't get expose events either, Stefan