From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>
To: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
Cc: 17168@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#17168: 24.3.50; Segfault at mark_object
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:42:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwvr45etote.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <533D6A19.8050504@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Antipov's message of "Thu, 03 Apr 2014 18:03:05 +0400")
> What about this workaround? Until we find a better solution,
> this should prevent crashes at least.
Let's try to find a better fix instead of another workaround around the
existing workaround.
So the existing workaround is here:
/* Check if the symbol was created during loadup. In such a case
it might be pointed to by pure bytecode which we don't trace,
so we conservatively assume that it is live. */
bool pure_p = PURE_POINTER_P (XSTRING (sym->s.name));
if (!sym->s.gcmarkbit && !pure_p)
{
if (sym->s.redirect == SYMBOL_LOCALIZED)
xfree (SYMBOL_BLV (&sym->s));
sym->s.next = symbol_free_list;
symbol_free_list = &sym->s;
#if GC_MARK_STACK
symbol_free_list->function = Vdead;
#endif
++this_free;
}
else
{
++num_used;
if (!pure_p)
eassert (!STRING_MARKED_P (XSTRING (sym->s.name)));
sym->s.gcmarkbit = 0;
}
I.e. any symbol with a pure name is assumed to be potentially reachable
from some pure objects. But not only this assumption is wrong, but its
implementation is wrong as well: we just keep the symbol without making
sure we also keep the objects it points to.
Furthermore, in theory some pure object may very well point to a symbol
whose name was not made pure. Worse, a pure object may point to several
other kinds of non-pure objects, so this special treatment we have for
symbols should really be applied to other "non-purifyable" objects.
How 'bout we change `purecopy' such that before doing
/* Not purified, don't hash-cons. */
return obj;
it adds the object to a table of "objects pointed from pure space"?
This table should probably be a hash-table (for simplicity), and of
course we'd only add objects to it when the purecopy call was
a recursive call, not for toplevel calls (i.e. calling (purecopy
<process>) should not add <process> to the table since it's not pointed
to from a pure object, whereas (purecopy '(<process>)) should).
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-03 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-02 7:44 bug#17168: 24.3.50; Segfault at mark_object Nicolas Richard
2014-04-02 15:53 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-02 17:59 ` Nicolas Richard
2014-04-02 16:29 ` Dmitry Antipov
2014-04-02 19:46 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-02 20:33 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-02 20:57 ` Nicolas Richard
2014-04-02 21:50 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-02 23:24 ` Stefan Monnier
2014-04-03 0:28 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-02 20:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-04-02 20:40 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-02 20:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-04-03 6:59 ` Dmitry Antipov
2014-04-03 7:04 ` Dmitry Antipov
2014-04-03 7:55 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-03 9:08 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-03 14:03 ` Dmitry Antipov
2014-04-03 15:42 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2014-04-03 16:47 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-03 17:49 ` Dmitry Antipov
2014-04-03 17:51 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-03 19:21 ` Stefan Monnier
2014-04-03 19:22 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-05 22:37 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-06 5:05 ` Dmitry Antipov
2014-04-06 5:11 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-06 18:00 ` Richard Stallman
2014-04-06 18:10 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-06 19:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-04-07 7:49 ` martin rudalics
2014-04-07 8:18 ` Dmitry Antipov
2014-04-07 9:20 ` martin rudalics
2014-04-06 12:36 ` Stefan Monnier
2014-04-06 15:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-04-06 15:59 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-06 16:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-04-06 16:24 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-06 16:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-04-06 16:37 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-06 16:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-04-06 17:11 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-06 19:44 ` Stefan Monnier
2014-04-06 19:42 ` Stefan Monnier
2014-04-06 15:46 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-06 19:58 ` Stefan Monnier
2014-04-06 20:13 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-06 20:53 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-06 21:08 ` Stefan Monnier
2014-04-06 21:37 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-07 16:28 ` Stefan Monnier
2014-04-07 19:06 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-07 20:42 ` Stefan Monnier
2014-04-08 7:14 ` martin rudalics
2014-04-08 8:47 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-04-06 18:01 ` Richard Stallman
2014-04-06 19:58 ` Stefan Monnier
2014-04-07 16:56 ` Richard Stallman
2014-04-02 20:49 ` Nicolas Richard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jwvr45etote.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=17168@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=dmantipov@yandex.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.