From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18399: 24.4.50; nadvice :filter-args -vs- interactive Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:13:46 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87mwagbhim.fsf@tromey.com> <87zjegh1wj.fsf@web.de> <87iol4baqs.fsf@tromey.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409836494 10229 80.91.229.3 (4 Sep 2014 13:14:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 13:14:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Heerdegen , 18399@debbugs.gnu.org To: Tom Tromey Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 04 15:14:46 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XPWs9-00063W-57 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:14:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50914 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPWs8-0002Pi-Mb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:14:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35639) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPWra-0001ra-J2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:14:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPWrT-0002Wt-2f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:14:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38702) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPWrT-0002Wl-0S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:14:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XPWrS-0007tA-Hg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 13:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18399 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 18399-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18399.140983643230303 (code B ref 18399); Thu, 04 Sep 2014 13:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18399) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2014 13:13:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58499 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XPWrI-0007sg-G6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:13:52 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:53723) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XPWrG-0007sX-L8 for 18399@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:13:51 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s84DDnRu022344; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 09:13:49 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id DDE146107F; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 09:13:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 03 Sep 2014 22:59:14 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV5053=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9378 : core <5053> : inlines <1239> : streams <1281225> : uri <1810229> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:93018 Archived-At: > FWIW, the use of a single formal arg receiving the actual arg-list > in :filter-args is based on performance reasons (we have the list > anyway, so it's more efficient to pass it to `funcall' than to `apply'). Oh, and also, this way the function can return the list as-is when the args don't need to be modified. Stefan